skip to content »

Forms of dating objects

More extensive evidence, largely ignored or brushed over by most of the agnostic scientific community, is contained in the excellent book Abstract: If an animal mates with another animal not of its exact species, the result will be a sterile creature (e.g. It would have to find a sexually compatible mate who was also fertile during its relatively miniscule life span on the overall evolutionary time scale.a horse mating with a donkey produces a sterile mule). Thirdly, their offspring would also have to be fertile and be able to continue the advance.

forms of dating objects-62forms of dating objects-14forms of dating objects-1forms of dating objects-9

Following are a number of arguments why the Theory of Evolution (and that's all it is) cannot be correct, and why Creation has to be correct.And any deviations from a normal union and offspring is sterile (not capable of reproduction). How could evolutionary processes possibly explain what we see all around us today?In short, the theory of evolution states that lower life evolved over eons into higher life forms.The second most compelling evidence for instantaneous creation pertains to the spherical halos caused by the decay of a radioactive core.These halos are found by the trillions in all Precambrian granites, the foundation stones of the earth's crust.When alpha particles are emitted by a radioactive speck in a given substrate or material, the alpha particles "run out of energy" a certain distance away from the core and leave a "damage" sphere or ring (when cross-sectioned). By measuring the diameter of the damaged ring, and also noting the various rings around a core, its fairly straightforward to determine what the exact center core particle was to begin with.

Reviewing: By it is easily possible to accurately determine what the composition was of the original radioactive material encased in the substrate.

Yet scientific observation reveals that of all the hermaphroditic creatures, only the flatworm is self-fertilizing.

Moreover, there are no (or a statistically insignificant number of) creatures that we might suppose or rationalize as evolving.

Without asexual characteristics or self-fertilizing hermaphroditic characteristics, how possibly could a mutant entity reproduce?

The chance of such a mutant finding an exact complementary mate within its lifespan would be extremely remote given the infrequency of mutations, and especially fertile mutations.

God spoke and the land (granites included) instantly formed.